Tax Shelters

Does Your Marital Property Include a Tax Shelter?

It is common for married couples with significant assets to create tax shelters, either in the United States or overseas. These shelters may be in the form of shell companies set up to show short-term losses or investment products designed to delay taxes until retirement or early withdrawal. In the event of divorce, the value of the investment must be characterized as either separate or marital property and subject to equitable distribution under New York marital property laws.

Appreciation of Assets and Transmutation of Assets

In property division cases where one party brought significant financial worth into the marriage, the tax shelter may have already been established and is often protected by a prenuptial agreement. Any assets that are added to the investment or used to enhance the shelter during the course of the marriage are considered commingled assets — or transmutation of assets — and will be characterized as marital property. This includes the current and future appreciation of the investment and tax savings realized from the shelter. When considering the division of assets, determining the extent of transmutation and the full appreciation in value of the investment requires knowledge of complex financial issues.

At the firm of Jonathan D. Katz, Attorney at Law, I work with forensic accountants and financial experts to investigate the full value of the tax shelter and the extent to which the property should retain its characterization as separate property. If you are an individual with high net worth and are seeking to protect the status of your tax shelter in your settlement, or have a rightful claim to equitable distribution of the property in your settlement, contact my offices in Saugerties, New York, to discuss your situation.

I offer extensive experience representing clients in high net worth divorces involving complex financial issues, including:

Call Hudson Valley Asset Protection Lawyer, Jonathan Katz

I am an experienced trial lawyer with more than 25 years of experience negotiating complex financial property settlements. I represent clients throughout the Hudson Valley, the Catskills and the New York City metro region.

Contact us calling (845) 328-2159 or toll-free (866) 843-6388 or fill out the online contact form to schedule your consultation with Jonathan D. Katz before you make decisions about how to handle your tax shelter in your property settlement.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
I was living a nightmare of being falsely accused in a judicial system that considers all fathers to be dead beat dads until proven innocent. Living out of state and facing the possibility of jail, I miraculously found Jon’s website and called his office. Within a week the tables were turned, the lies were exposed, and the harassment was stopped. If you need someone that will challenge the system, then you need Jonathan Katz. Greg Weaver
★★★★★
Jon’s integrity towards his clients is what makes him a standout attorney. He makes it a priority to know what's important to you. You’re not just a number. He is upfront with you right from the start. He will not string you along just for his financial benefit. He is only willing to settle the case if that's truly what you want. Anytime I called him I received a call back from him that day. Not someone else in the office. He is an attorney that has a passion for what's important to his clients. John Morrissey
★★★★★
Being a single mom, I had enough stress in my life. I had no idea how to go about protecting myself. My daughters were my priority. Jon walked me through the process. He turned a difficult time into a workable solution. Diane Chiriani
★★★★★
Jon thinks well, works to be clear and honest. He works to get to a strong argument. He seems to have a good working relationship with everybody at the courthouse. I get the feeling he has no trouble thinking like a judge. He is friendly and courteous. He doesn't overbill. He takes and returns calls promptly. His legal staff is friendly and competent. What's not to like? Rick S.
★★★★★
I liked that there was always transparency throughout my case. Genevieve H.